Fred Reichheld, Author, The Ultimate Question: Making the Golden Rule Relevant

 

Interesting article.  When we all look a the phrase, "The Golden Rule" we think Christianity.  There is more to life then Christianity.  Nothing wrong with Christianity, but there are many more faiths/religions out in the world.

The most important reason that there should be  a better phrase is that treating others with respect is more general then a religion.  It is more or less common sense to treat others as you would like to be treated.  It has nothing to do with faith in a God.  It has everything to do with faith in oneself.  If we hate ourselves, it may be impossible to love others.  That means if we are going to treat others as we would like to be treated, then we must have a respectable and positive love for ourselves, or it may turn out that we are treating others just as bad.

How I look at it, this act is more then a title or a name.  It is a means of how we think and act on it.  So calling it the Golden Rule works for you, then do so.  Just remember that you are not the only one in the world.  Do not simply shove that phrase in people's faces.  That in itself is not going by the same phrase.

It does require a master in Christianity or any other religion to show respect towards others.  It is the attitude of mind that makes all the difference.  How easy is it to show love for someone that is nice and sweet, but one should also show the same love and respect for others that might be mean and hateful.  Remember that two wrongs does not make a right.  One may have to avoid trouble makers, but do not fall into their own demise.  Each and everyone of us is responsible for our own actions.

Good Manners & the Golden Rule in the Office & Workplace 01

 

Part 2

 

Religious Tolerance: The Golden Rule

 

Even though religion has nothing to do with respect towards others, it can speak very loudly on this issue.  There is a lot of hate and judging in this world, but that is no excuse for anyone to do it.  We must learn tolerance of the differences that others have.  Come right down to it, no two people are exactly alike.  There will always be differences.  Even twins have some differences among each other.  The human being is surely a very unique creature on Earth.

 

Blessed Be to Isis and you,

 

 

Real Name:  Brandon Bowers

 

 

 

Fred Reichheld, Author, The Ultimate Question: Making the Golden Rule Relevant

Honey, let's become nudists' - CNN.com

 

For the first time, I have used a new search engine, Surfwax. I learned about this from an online friend from my Mixx account.  This person shared this with me:   100 Useful Tips and Tools to Research the Deep Web.  It proves that no one search engine has everything.  In thinking about it, the Internet is far to large to have one search engine doing that.

The reason for wanting to post this in my blog is to show that we can do anything we want to in life, especially in the United States of America.  The problems that keep us from fulfilling those desires is do to what the majority thinks.  Nothing wrong with pleasing our friends and the community at large, but what does that have to do with living our own lives?  Spite what you parents have or have not teach you, it is up to each and everyone of us to live our own lives.  No one can, or has the right to live your life for us.

It was the love that her husband had for her that allowed her to open up something in her life.  It seemed to have made a big difference from the result.  It is very sad that the media, like the news, always shows the negatives in life.  There are more positives in life then you may realize.  Actually, there are no such things positive or negative.  It is how you make life out to be.

We either listen and believe that things are as bad as it is said on the news and other media formats or we do not.  If we stop listening to what others say and make life out to be what we want it to be, then life is a negative.  It is not necessarily negative because it is said to be that way, but because we do not take up the responsibilities in our own lives and make things happen the way we want them to become.  Freedom is not sitting on our butts and doing nothing.  As with tending a garden, every aspect of our lives but have a daily nurturing.

Being a nudist might not be you cup of tea, but as you can seen after reading this article (link at the bottom of this posting) this woman thought the same as so many have thought about being a nudist.  It was after she experienced what is was to be a nudist, she learn something very important about herself.  That is why I am writing this posting on this article.  Only an open mind can only  allow one to live life to the fullest.

As I have learned that I can find things online by using different means, I have found this article.  What more can I do if I continue to use more systems online?  Before I was looking at the Internet through a key whole.  Since I am learning to open the door, I can see a lot more.  I think that is what this article is stating.

 

Blessed Be to Isis and you,

 

 

Real Name:  Brandon Bowers

 

 

Honey, let's become nudists' - CNN.com

USA Government is Failing Its People

 

How are the USA government failing us?  UH.......Nearly every way that can be done, and then they make up new ways to do more, and more, and more, and more.  Why would they do this?  The government is suppose to serve and protect the people, yes?  Answer, hell no!

The main things that are hurting the people of the United States of America is bad schools, low job rate, bad economy, lobbyist that controls governments systems, etc.  Because of all this, we have less and less choices in our lives.  Parents cannot choose what schools their own children goes to.  With our very poor healthcare system we cannot always choose which doctors we want to go to.  This sounds like a social medicine, but the government are not doing anything.

Everything in life starts out with a proper and complete education.  The old saying is not "Ignorance is power," but "Knowledge is power."  So many people today wants socialized medicine.  This is why socialized medicine in the USA will not work:  The things that the government is in control of like public education is failing, failing, failing, and failing, while schools in other countries are wining in every way it can.  Here is a 40:45 video from 20/20 in showing how bad our school are. This video was record in 2007:

 

 

How can these students get a good job if their education is an all time LOW?  With our technology improving on a fast and constant rate, businesses needs young employees ready for this technology.  As stated in this video, students are not getting even the basic public education. 

Government Screws up Everything it Touches: Part 1 of 6

 

 

How much money have the average person given in taxes?  Has it done anything?  Everyone says, more money for schools.  From the first video of this blog posting, we have learned that is hype, a lie, and does not make a difference.  As the last sentence in the next video state, "The government does not have to follow the same rules as we do, and we are the ones that have to pay for it.  Makes a lot of good sense, yes.  Uh........NO!

Why do we have laws?  By the general answer it is to control chaos.  The reality of what is going on in the USA is chaos....for the WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  The why it is this way most might already know.  The government has gotten to big for it own britches.  They simply control far more then a government should be doing, or they are controlling the wrong things.

Sources of Laws

1. Immanuel Kant, [[Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals]] (Translated by Mary Gregor) (Cambridge University Press, 1785).
2. H. L.A Hart, [[The Concept of Law]] (Oxford University Press, 1961).
3. Friedrich Hayek, [[The Constitution of Liberty]] (University Of Chicago Press, 1978).
4. John Austin, [[The Province of Jurisprudence Determined]], 1831.
5. Tom D Campbell, “A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy edited by Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit,” in The Contribution of Legal Studies, 1993.
6. Goldhaber Michael D. and Goldhaber Michael D., “A People's History of the European Court of Human Rights,” in Europe's Supreme Court (Rutgers University Press, 2007).
7. J. M Kelly, A Short History of Western Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 1992).
8. Robin Paul Malloy, “Adam Smith and the Philosophy of Law and Economics,” in Adam Smith and the Modern Discourse of Law and Economics (Springer, 1994).
9. Jean-Bernard Auby, “Administrative Law of the European Union, its Member States and the United States,” in Administrative Law in France (Intersentia, 2002).
10. James R Gordley and Arthur Taylor von Mehren, An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Private Law, 2006.
11. Eric G Jensen and Thomas C Heller, “Beyond Common Knowledge,” in Introduction (Stanford University Press, 2003).
12. Ludwig von Mises, Bureaucracy, 1962, http://www.mises.org/etexts/bureaucracy.pdf.
13. Martin Albrow, Bureaucracy (Key Concepts in Political Science) (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1970).
14. A. W.B Simpson, Cannibalism and the Common Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).
15. Mark E Warren, Civil Society and Good Governance (Washington DC: Center for the Study of Voluntary Organisations and Services, Georgetown University, 1999).
16. David Jary and Julia Jary, Collins Dictionary of Sociology (HarperCollins, 1995).
17. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765, http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/blackstone/blacksto.htm.
18. L. S Sealy and R. J.A Hooley, Commercial Law (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003).
19. Ugo Mattei, “Comparative Law and Economics,” in The Distinction between Common Law and Civil Law (University of Michigan Press, 1997).
20. David Luban, “Conflict of Interest in the Professions,” in Law's Blindfold (Oxford University Press, 2001).
21. John E Finn, “Constitutions in Crisis: Political Violence and the Rule of Law,” in Constitutional Dissolution in the Weimar Republic (Oxford University Press, 1991).
22. Hugh Beale and Denis Tallon, “Contract Law,” in English Law: Consideration (Hart Publishing, 2002).
23. Geoffrey Robertson, Crimes Against Humanity (Penguin, 2006).
24. David C Brody and James R. ; Logan Acker, “Criminal Law,” in Introduction to the Study of Criminal Law (Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2000).
25. William Wilson, “Criminal Law,” in Understanding Criminal Law (Pearson Education, 2003).
26. Friedrich Carl von Savigny, “Das Recht des Besitzes,” in Zu welcher Classe von Rechten gehört der Besitz?, 1803, http://dlib-pr.mpier.mpg.de/m/kleioc/0010/exec/books/%22235083%22.
27. Paul A. B Clarke and Andrew Linzey, Dictionary of Ethics, Theology and Society, 1996.
28. Dagmar Kaiser, “Eckpfeiler Des Zivilrechts,” in Leistungsstōrungen (Walter de Gruyter, 2005).
29. Stanford M Jakoby, “Economic Ideas and the Labour Market,” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 25, no. 1 (Winter 2005): 43–78.
30. Max Weber, “Economy and Society, Volume I (Translated and edited by Claus Wittich, Ephraim Fischoff, and Guenther Roth),” in Bureaucracy and Political Leadership (University of California Press, 1978).
31. Georg Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, 1820, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/preface.htm.
32. Knut Dörmann and Louise; Kolb Doswald-Beck, “Elements of War Crimes,” in Appendix (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
33. Asli Demirgüç-Kunt and Ross Levine, “Financial Structures and Economic Growth,” in Financial Structures and Economic Growth (MIT Press, 2001).
34. Paolo Farah, “Five Years of China WTO Membership. EU and US Perspectives about China's Compliance with Transparency Commitments and the Transitional Review Mechanism,” Legal Issues of Economic Integration 33, no. 3 (August 2006): 263–304.
35. Nikos Kazantzakis, “Friedrich Nietzsche and the Philosophy of Law and Polity,” in Law (Athens: Editions Kazantzakis, 1909).
36. Apostolos S Georgiadis, “General Principles of Civil Law,” in Sources of Law (Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publishers, 1997).
37. Mary Kaldor and Helmut; Glasius Anheier, “Global Civil Society Yearbook 2003,” in Global Civil Society in an Era of Regressive Globalisation (Oxford University Press, 2003).
38. Deirdre Curtin and Ramses A Wessel, “Good Governance and the European Union: Reflections on Concepts, Institutions and Substance,” in A Survey of the Content of Good Governance for some International Organisations (Intersentia nv, 2005).
39. W. E.J Richardson, “Hammurabi's Laws,” in Introduction (Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004).
40. Michael D Bayles, “Hart's Legal Philosophy,” in A Critique of Austin (Springer, 1992).
41. Julius Stone, “Human Law and Human Justice,” in Early Horizons of Justice in the West (Stanford University Press, 1965).
42. Henry G Schermers and Niels M Blokker, “International Institutional Law,” in Supervision and Sanctions (The Hague/London/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, 1995).
43. World Intellectual Property Organization and World Intellectual Property Organization, “Introduction to Intellectual Property,” in The System of Intellectual Property (Kluwer Law International, 1997).
44. Dicey Albert Venn, “Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution,” in Parliamentary Sovereignty and Federalism (Adamant Media Corporation, 2005).
45. Anastasios Giannoulatos, “Islam – A General Survey,” in Characteristics of Modern Islam (Athens: Poreuthentes, 1975).
46. Mahmoud A El-Gamal, Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice ([[Cambridge University Press]], 2006).
47. Gamal Moursi Badr, “Islamic Law: Its Relation to Other Legal Systems,” The American Journal of Comparative Law 26, no. 2 (Spring 1978): 187–198, doi:10.2307/839667.
48. Hubert Rottleuthner, “La Sociologie du Droit en Allemagne,” Droit et Société 11 (December 1989): 101–120.
49. Aristide Théodoridés, “law,” in Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt (Routledge (UK), 1999).
50. Théodoridés, “law,” in Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt.
51. Jay M Feinman, “Law 101,” in Criminal Responsibility and Criminal Law (Oxford University Press US, 2006).
52. Alan Redfem, “Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration,” in Regulation of International Arbitration (Sweet & Maxwell, 2004).
53. Heiner Bielefeldt, “Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism,” in Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Systematic Reconstruction and Countercriticism (Duke University Press, 1998).
54. Russ VerSteeg, Law in Ancient Egypt, 2002.
55. J. N.D Anderson, “Law Reform in the Middle East,” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944—) 32, no. 1 (January 1956): 43–51, doi:10.2307/2607811.
56. Marc Findlay, “Law, Capitalism and Power in Asia,” in 'Independence' and the Judiciary in the PRC (Routledge, 1999).
57. Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire (Harvard University Press, 1986).
58. Ahmad Atif Ahmad, “Lawyers: Islamic Law,” in Oxford Encyclopedia of Legal History (Oxford University Press), http://www.macalester.edu/~ahmad/Lawyers.pdf.
59. Geoffrey C Hazard and Angelo Dondi, Legal Ethics (Stanford University Press, 2004).
60. H. Patrick Glenn, Legal Traditions of the World (Oxford University Press, 2000).
61. Thomas Hobbes, “Leviathan,” in Chapter XVII: Of The Causes, Generation, And Definition Of a Commonwealth, 1651, http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html.
62. Lucas Bergkamp, “Liability and Environment,” in Introduction (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001).
63. David René and John E. C Brierley, Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law (London: Stevens, 1985).
64. Patrick Olivelle, Manu's Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the ''Manava-Dharmasastra (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).
65. M. Rheinstein, Max Weber on Law and Economy in Society (Harvard University Press, 1954).
66. Adolf Berle, Modern Corporation and Private Property, 1932.
67. John Linarelli, “Nietzsche in Law's Cathedral: Beyond Reason and Postmodernism,” Catholic University Law Review 53 (2004): 413–457.
68. Brian Z Tamanaha, “On the Rule of Law,” in Locke, Montesquieu the Federalist Papers (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
69. Hans Wehberg, “Pacta Sunt Servanda,” The American Journal of International Law 53, no. 4 (October 1959): 775–786, doi:10.2307/2195750.
70. Stephan Haggard, “Presidents, Parliaments and Policy,” in Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
71. Matthew Soberg Shugart and Stephan Haggard, “Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy,” in Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
72. Lesley A Jakobs, “Pursuing Equal Opportunities,” in Retrieving Equality of Opportunity (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
73. Hubert Rottleuthner, “Rechtstheoritische Probleme der Sociologie des Rechts. Die Kontroverse zwischen Hans Kelsen und Eugen Ehrlich (1915/17),” Rechtstheorie 5 (1984): 521–551.
74. Mark Washofsky, “Re-Examining Progressive Halakhah edited by Walter Jacob, Moshe Zemer,” in Taking Precedent Seriously (Berghahn Books, 2002).
75. Peter Stein, Roman Law in European History (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
76. John McGhee, Snell's Equity (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2000).
77. Georges Gurvitch and Alan Hunt, “Sociology of Law,” in Max Webber and Eugene Ehrlich (Athens: Transaction Publishers, 1942).
78. T. K Papachristou, “Sociology of Law,” in The Sociological Approach of Law (Athens: A.N. Sakkoulas Publishers, 1999).
79. Francis Fukuyama, State-Building (Editions Livanis, 2005).
80. Josiah Ober, “The Athenian Revolution: Essays on Ancient Greek Democracy and Political Theory,” in The Nature of Athenian Democracy (Princeton University Press, 1996).
81. Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law, Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford University Press, 1979).
82. Alan Johnson, The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology (Blackwells publishers, 1995).
83. Ron Harris, “The Bubble Act: Its Passage and Its Effects on Business Organization,” The Journal of Economic History 54, no. 3 (September 1994): 610-27.
84. Emile Durkheim, The Division of Labor in Society (The Free Press reprint, 1893).
85. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, “The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System,” in Rule of Law and Constitutionalism (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997).
86. Winston Churchill, “The Hinge of Fate,” in Problems of War and Peace (Houghton Mifflin Books, 1986).
87. Monica M Gaudiosi, “The Influence of the Islamic Law of Waqf on the Development of the Trust in England: The Case of Merton College,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 136, no. 4 (April 1988): 1231-1261.
88. Tony F Fine, “The Internationalization of the Practice of Law,” in The Globalization of Legal Education in the United States (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001).
89. John A Makdisi, “The Islamic Origins of the Common Law,” [[North Carolina Law Review]] 77, no. 5 (June 1999): 1635–1739.
90. William H Riker, “The Justification of Bicameralism,” International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 13, no. 1 (January 1992): 101–116.
91. Paul Matthews, “The Man of Property,” Medical Law Review, 3 (Autumn 1995): 251–274, doi:10.1093/medlaw/3.3.251.
92. Ronald H Coase, “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica 4, no. 16 (November 1937): 386–405, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.
93. Aristides N Hatzis, “The Nature of the Firm,” European Journal of Law and Economics 14, no. 3 (November 2002): 253–263, doi:10.1023/A:1020749518104.
94. David M. Olson and Norton, Philip Olson, David M., “The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe,” in Legislatures in Democratic Transition (Frank Cass (UK), 1996).
95. Wael Bahjat Hallaq, “The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law,” in Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
96. Don Kettl, “The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions edited by R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder and Bert A. Rockman,” in Public Bureaucracies (Oxford University Press, 2006).
97. Ronald H Coase, “The Problem of Social Cost (this online version excludes some parts),” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (October 1960): 1–44.
98. Anatole France, The Red Lily (Le lys rouge), 1894, http://www.online-literature.com/anatole-france/red-lily/.
99. Behrooz Akhlaghi, “The Sharīʻa in the Constitutions of Afghanistan, Iran, and Egypt,” in Iranian Commercial Law and the New Investment Law FIPPA (Mohr Siebeck, 2005).
100. Mohammad Rasekh, “The Sharīʻa in the Constitutions of Afghanistan, Iran, and Egypt,” in Are Islamism and Republicanism Compatible? (Mohr Siebeck, 2005).
101. Adel Omar Sherif, “The Sharīʻa in the Constitutions of Afghanistan, Iran, and Egypt,” in Constitutions of Arab Countries and the Position of Sharia (Mohr Siebeck, 2005).
102. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, “The Social Contract (translated in English by G. D. H. Cole),” in Book II: Chapter 6 (Law), 1762, http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/r/rousseau/jean_jacques/r864s/book2.html#section16.
103. Baron de Montesquieu, “The Spirit of Laws (translated in English by Thomas Nugent, revised by J. V. Prichard),” in Book XI: Of the Laws Which Establish Political Liberty, with Regard to the Constitution, Chapters 6–7, 1748, http://www.constitution.org/cm/sol.htm.
104. A. Z Pelczynski, The State and Civil Society (Cambridge University Press, 1984).
105. Panagiotis Karkatsoulis, “The State in Transition,” in Civil Society and New Public Management (Athens: I. Sideris, 2004).
106. Stephen A Smith, “The Structure of Unjust Enrichment Law: Is Restitution a Right or a Remedy,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 36, no. 2 (winter 2003): 1037–1062.
107. Max Weber, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Edited with Introduction by Talcott Parsons – Translated in English by A. M. Henderson) (The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964).
108. A. G Roeber, “What the Law Requires Is Written on Their Hearts: Noachic and Natural Law among German-Speakers in Early Modern North America,” The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series 58, no. 4 (October 2001): 883–912.
109. Friedrich Nietzsche, “Zur Genealogie der Moral – Eine Streitschrift,” in Zweite Abhandlung: "Schuld", "schlechtes Gewissen" und Verwandtes, 1887, http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/?id=5&xid=1948&kapitel=1#gb_found.

 

Here is a solution....why not allow competition to control things.  That means each and everyone of us will be responsible for our own personal life, community, and even the country as a whole.  After all the Constitution of the United States of America has a Preamble stating those three large words:  "WE THE PEOPLE."  Done right, there will be no chaos.  Liberty is freedom.  Authority without freedom is tyranny.  Freedom without authority is chaos or anarchy.

President Elect Obama stated, "We need change in our government."  I hope he can change things to the way it should be done.  There is nothing wrong with the government having its hands in things as long as it does not take away the freedoms and rights of others.  A government without its people flourishing is dead nation.  Both the government and the people both must stand up tall for a nation to thrive.  If one sinks, the other will follow.

The scariest part of competition is big business or lobbyist.  Lobbyist have done more damage towards the USA then anything else, minus our governments.  Have you forgotten about NAFTA?  What good ever came from it for the USA or any other country?  The damages that NAFTA has done to us is so great that if we pulled out of it cold turkey, it would hurt us even more.  We either try to swallow the extremely large pill that we have, or we swallow something lager.

Sources for NAFTA

1. Major Garrett, “After emotionless debate, Senate votes for NAFTA,” [[The Washington Times]], November 21, 1993.
2. Clifford Krauss, “In finagling on trade pact, legislators' barter is votes,” [[The New York Times]], October 5, 1993.
3. Norbert Fiess and Daniel Lederman, “Mexican Corn: The Effects of NAFTA,” Trade Note 18 (November 24, 2004), http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/LAC/LACInfoClient.nsf/d29684951174975c85256735007fef12/026efe204f018bc885256f40006d1901/$FILE/TradeNote18.pdf.

 

As President Elect Obama stated, we all have to work together to fix this.  Once again, we are the ones holding the bag.  I hope that Congress and President Elect Obama can help also.  It took many, many years for our government to mess things up.  Even though things are very bad, I strongly believe we have a better chance of recovery then in the 1930s.

Our technology is a lot better then the 1930s.  Things are constantly be created with our technology.  We given the Jerry Lewis Telethon in 2008, $64 Million Dollars.  Black Friday of 2008 was better then last year.  In a lot of ways our economy shows progress.  So what is going on with our economy?

If things are looking good, then what is happening to jobs in the USA.  It has mostly to do with NAFTA.  When factories move out of one country to another, more then just jobs go with it.  The United States of America relies on free enterprise.  Due to NAFTA, we have lost a giant hunk of that free enterprise.  Another words, our federal government sold us out due to lobbyist, or big business.

We must have the right type of competition without having big business ruining things.  Right now there is a non-government program that is aiming for space.  There are organizations that are helping people that cannot help themselves that have nothing to do with government.  There are mom and pop stores that do more for the community then any big business could ever do.  In every walk of life, there are things going on that has nothing to do with big business or our government.  Since it is WE THE POEPLE, then it might take us all to make this county our country.

 

Blessed Be to Isis and you,

 

 

Real Name:  Brandon Bowers